Nissan ECU Tuning Forum Index Nissan ECU Tuning
Welcome to Nissan ECU Tuning
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

physical side of dual afm - question about wiring

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nissan ECU Tuning Forum Index -> 300zx Chip Tuning
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cb_drift



Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 472
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:53 am    Post subject: physical side of dual afm - question about wiring Reply with quote

whats the wiring side of things look like?

do you just hook up two airflow meters and bridge their signal wires?
or use only one afm signal?
or do you have to run some sort of signal processor that takes two incoming signals and adds them together and then 1/2's the result to send to the ecu?

theres a program out from Eric i think that does all the calcs needed to the rom for running dual mafs - but im interested in how the physical wiring works out - as this system would of course work on any nissan single afm ecu and could solve some issues with afm limits on more extreme cars....
(or not so extreme cars where the owner is a tightwad Razz)

and if Eric could link to his program from here that would be cool - or give a rundown on what changes and why for the K val etc that would be cooler Smile
eg change K by x because two afm's do blah to signal - or change vq map by 1/2 or something...

apart from the ecu having two physical inputs - how different is the gtr method of dual afm's?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
romdoc1



Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CB one way to accomplish the dual maf set-up would be to plumb one maf right behind the other. Then all you would need to do is modify your K value to suite for dual Mafs. That's it. One other thing to note is that it really works better with larger than stock injectors.

By the way I am basising my arguments here on the dummy secondary maf ste up, that means no additional wiring.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eric



Joined: 17 Nov 2003
Posts: 258
Location: Holland

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

>> do you just hook up two airflow meters and bridge their signal wires?

easiest way is to use an Apexi AFC/Neo
it will support input of two AFM's and will have 1 signal output.
You can have the Apexi add or average the signal of the AFM's

>> and if Eric could link to his program from here that would be cool

http://300zx-twinturbo.com/temp/rom_rescale.1.1.exe

>> or give a rundown on what changes and why for the K val

2 intakes, 1 afm: K x 2
2 intakes, 2 afm + AFC in ADD mode: K x 1
2 intakes, 2 afm + AFC in AVG mode: K x 2

this only applies to twinturbo setups, with seperate intakes

>> apart from the ecu having two physical inputs - how different is the gtr method of dual afm's?

it basically does the same as the AFC, but it's internally handled by the ECU.

>> as this system would of course work on any nissan single afm ecu and could solve some issues with afm limits on more extreme cars

my own preference is to ditch the AFM(s) and use a MAP sensor setup instead...it is a more reliable option (IMO)
The Nissan AFM's are very sensitive to air swirls and turbulence and these false reading can cause screwed up AFR levels.
_________________

DTA-motorsport
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
cb_drift



Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 472
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

and that is why i like this place Smile

ask and get exactly what your after Smile cheers for that Eric Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
The_S_Man



Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 19
Location: Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eric wrote:
my own preference is to ditch the AFM(s) and use a MAP sensor setup instead...it is a more reliable option (IMO)


Eric-

This may be a not so bright question.... is it possible to use a 5 Volt MAP sensor's signal with the stock ECU instead of the MAF? I would imagine that the VQ table would have to be remapped...

Thanks,
Jamie
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bazza1600



Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 13
Location: nz

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wont work by itself as it doesnt know the air volume - just the pressure - get a tmap from a new mini - temp compensated map sensor - but its only good for very low boost and na cars really... not heard of anyone trying one yet on a nissan either
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jollwah



Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have been thinking about this quite a bit lately.

Have been searching for a simple voltage averaging circuit without much success.

have come up with this, but I am not a 100% sure it would work. I'd try to prove it before using it.

AFM 1--------/\/\/\/\-----I
10 Ohms I
I------/\/\/\/\------ to ecu
I 5 Ohms
AFM 2--------/\/\/\/\-----I
10 Ohms

The resistor values a examples only and I have only put them in to show the relationships between the resistors.

This would increase the impedance of the circuit and I was thinking that this maybe accounted for by adjusting the K value to suit.

I have no idea if this is even going to work satisfactory but I would try it before buying SAFC neo or whatever to ave. AFM voltages.

If anyone has tried this and it didn't work please post a reply and save me effort of proving this with dummy circuit and variable voltage sources etc.

regards,
nathan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jollwah



Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Er that didn't work.

try this sorry about my artistic skills, I have none.

http://www.fast-files.com/getfile.aspx?file=4982

[/list]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nzniggles



Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Posts: 56
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Probably a very random result with that circuit as one AFM would load the other then you have to factor in the ECU. The only real way would be an op-amp adding circuit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deviousKA



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Posts: 107

PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The_S_Man wrote:
Eric wrote:
my own preference is to ditch the AFM(s) and use a MAP sensor setup instead...it is a more reliable option (IMO)


Eric-

This may be a not so bright question.... is it possible to use a 5 Volt MAP sensor's signal with the stock ECU instead of the MAF? I would imagine that the VQ table would have to be remapped...

Thanks,
Jamie


The VQ table does not take into account RPM , it has only a single axis based of voltage to plot Q.

In order to better simulate Q using a MAP sensor the original VQ routine must be bypassed to a 2 axis 3d (XYZ) fine tuned plot using both RPM and MAP sensor to obtain an appropriate simulated MSB for Q. After that the LSB must be calculated and both the MSB/LSB must be applied to software based intake charge temperature compensation. This is necessary for all pressure sensors even so called temperature compensated sensors (which have temperature compensation of the bridge drift, not to be confused with something allowing you to skip intake temp compensation altogether).

This may sound difficult but is actually quite easily possible, I have done it on other ECCS systems. A VE table can even be autoplotted while in MAF based mode if an extra ADC channel is available and streamed through consult (allowing both MAF and MAP input at same time).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Jollwah



Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nzniggles wrote:
Probably a very random result with that circuit as one AFM would load the other then you have to factor in the ECU. The only real way would be an op-amp adding circuit.


Unsure of how one afm would load the other as they are wired in parrallel the averaging circuit takes each afm output and averages them.

I can see that adding the averaging circuit will increase the impedance of the entire circuit, inc at each sensor possibly giving a lower voltage values.

I figured that this would be a fixed constant and able to be tuned out at the ecu by tweaking the K value in addition to doubling it to compensate for the inreased flow through the second meter.

Edit: When I trial this circuit on the bench I'll try to ensure that the resistor values are as small as practical to minimise the effects on the overall impedance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eric



Joined: 17 Nov 2003
Posts: 258
Location: Holland

PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

>> A VE table can even be autoplotted while in MAF based mode if an extra ADC channel is available and streamed through consult (allowing both MAF and MAP input at same time).

on a 300ZX ECU it is possible also.
You can use the fuel temp signal for the map sensor. (you will have to modify some code though).
In the original configuration the fueltemp sensor signal is barely used and disabling it in the code doesn't make any difference to the driveability of the car.
I use it as an extra 0-5V input very frequently


>> This would increase the impedance of the circuit and I was thinking that this maybe accounted for by adjusting the K value to suit.

>> I have no idea if this is even going to work satisfactory but I would try it before buying SAFC neo or whatever to ave. AFM voltages.

it won't work.
it's not a matter of just averaging the signal of the 2 afm's electronically...been there, done that and doesn't work

at low load the voltage will be too small, causing the ECU to throw a DTC error
Even after modifying the code handling the AFM, it didn't work correctly

you will need a cpu and a lookup table (similar to the VQ map), which looks up the voltages of the AFM's and output a voltage that is stored in the lookup table.
This is also how the Apexi AFC/Neo works.
_________________

DTA-motorsport
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nissan ECU Tuning Forum Index -> 300zx Chip Tuning All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Free Forum Free Top Site List
Make this Forum Ad-Free