Nissan ECU Tuning Forum Index Nissan ECU Tuning
Welcome to Nissan ECU Tuning
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

adjustable fuel pressure reg - correct way to set?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nissan ECU Tuning Forum Index -> Turbo Related
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cb_drift



Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 472
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 12:13 pm    Post subject: adjustable fuel pressure reg - correct way to set? Reply with quote

been having a discussion with a friend and we cant figure out the way to set the fuel pressure reg correctly

say you have installed a set of injectors that are 550cc at 2.5bar fuel pressure

do you set the reg to 2.5bar with the vac/boost line connected or not?

eg - to get 550cc at 2.5bar - is that 2.5bar with the air line connected to the reg when the car is idling - or 2.5bar with the air line disconnected from the reg when the car is idling...

seeing as the regulator will drop fuel pressure on vac and add fuel pressure under boost i was thinking set the fuel pressure to the rating needed as a base and let the air line change things as needed after that - but a friend recons its set the other way...

anyone got a definative answer for me please? no guesses - i want to know the most accurate way to set the fuel pressure reg to get the rated flow from the injectors at their suggested fuel pressure....

also - assuming that you have a sufficently flowing regulator - would there be any downside to oversizing the fuel pump specs by lots (eg fitting a 500lph @ 5bar fuel pump to a car that used to have a 200lph @ 3bar fuel pump) ignoring the examples overkill of course Smile

cheers and happy new year Smile

lawrence
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
luk



Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:01 pm    Post subject: Re: adjustable fuel pressure reg - correct way to set? Reply with quote

cb_drift wrote:
seeing as the regulator will drop fuel pressure on vac and add fuel pressure under boost i was thinking set the fuel pressure to the rating needed as a base and let the air line change things as needed after that - but a friend recons its set the other way...


You're right! Fuel pressure should always be proportional to manifold pressure. In this particular case you should always have a 2.5bar pressure differential.

Because ecu assume that injectors have a constant mass flow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oops



Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 100

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi as luk says, you need to find out if this 2.5 bar is at a particular intake manifold pressure or the pressure differential.

eg, a stock GTiR has the fuel pressure test @ 2.94 bar without vac'... so one would assume one atmosphere (1000 m bar) so when vac' line connected and engine idle, intake pressure at "roughly" 400-500m bar gives a fuel pressure of 2.5 bar. and a difference of 2

engine idle intake 400-500 m bar @ 2.5 bar fuel pressure = 2 bar difference.
engine WOT ( natuarlly aspirated ) intake 1000 m bar @ 3 bar fuel pressure = 2 bar difference.
engine on boost at (atmosphere + 1 bar) @ 4 bar fuel pressure = 2 bar difference

Fitting an uprated fuel pump (more LPH) just ensures the rail doesn't starve when the injectors try to empty it.

Regards..
_________________
changed my user name
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lew_ecu



Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suppose a related topic is variable FPR like the BEGI unit. My bro picked up one cheap online and put it on his vg30 turbo modded car.

According to BEGI, you dial in the fuel pressure with no vacuum or boost first. This actually sets the 'crossover' fuel pressure (when the car goes from no-boost to boost). You can then set the 'ramp-up' rate as boost kicks in, pressure is increased. Reattaching the vacuum brings the car to idle fuel pressure.

This crossover fuel pressure should be stronger than stock. How much stronger depends on the car's technology. If its a turbo-modified car with a throttle position pot, then it should be higher. If its a car like a vg30 that relys mostly on MAF, then not as rich.

What happens with this variable fuel pressure approach is that the ecu goes open-loop and adjusts the PWM on the injectors under the assumption of a 'constant' fuel pressure. What really happens is that the ecu is tricked out and flows much more fuel in relation to the boost signal to the BEGI unit.

The overall effect is that the car will run very nicely closed loop with smallish injectors and becomes a fuel fed turbo car under boost (the extra fuel pressure makes them flow more). There are limitations of course. Fuel pump output and too small injectors, etc.

An interesting thing is that IF the actual running fuel pressure under FULL vacuum is slightly lower than stock, the car's own closed loop ecu O2 feedback will increase the injectors PWM and also set the open-loop values higher. This is from the adaptive control scheme that most ecus use. So this is an added bonus that can be achieved. Of course, you can not set the fuel pressure that low.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
datsunboy



Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 209
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think I would prefer my FPR to rise at a constant rate, so that the injectors are going to flow exactly the same rate the whole time.
this would make it far easier to tune your fuel maps for.
because as the others have said, the ECU assumes a constant rate of supply of the fuel.
one that operates in a fashion that you described, would be good if you werent going to try tune your fuel maps...and only rely on the FPR to give it the extra fuel needed on boost
_________________
1970 Datsun 1600 CA18DET Project

The point of life is not 2 arrive at your grave all preserved & in mint condition, but 2 slide in sideways, scratched & bruised screaming F**K WHAT A RIDE!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Lew_ecu



Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

datsunboy wrote:
I think I would prefer my FPR to rise at a constant rate, so that the injectors are going to flow exactly the same rate the whole time.
this would make it far easier to tune your fuel maps for.
because as the others have said, the ECU assumes a constant rate of supply of the fuel.
one that operates in a fashion that you described, would be good if you werent going to try tune your fuel maps...and only rely on the FPR to give it the extra fuel needed on boost


Actually you could still tune your fuel MAPs. If you really felt that you had a means to justify any changes. By that I mean testing feedback device.

The main advantage of a device like the BEGI is that it can make smaller injectors flow more fuel. The injectors are going to flow 'exactly the same the whole time'. There's no reason that ECU tuning could not also be used with the device also.

The whole point that I am trying to make is that if you have an adjustable FPR and raise the fuel pressure across the board, the ECU will null it out. An example is if you have a device that raises the FP 5 PSI across the whole vacuum/boost response.

At idle and part throttle conditions, when there is O2 sensor feedback, the ecu will sense the extra fuel flow and adjust the PWM accordingly to bring the closed loop operation into stoichiometric range. It will also change the adaptive control parameters accordingly. In other words, it will derate open-loop gains also. The ECU is self-tuning in other words (or most modern FI systems are).

Thats where the BEGI has an advantage. It keeps the closed loop conditions 'normal' and only operates when the ecu has gone open-loop. As I said, it allows smaller injectors to act 'larger'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
datsunboy



Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 209
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ANY adjustable FPR can make smaller injectors flow more.

from your previous post, I thought you were saying that the BEGI FPR would increase fuel pressure to different amounts accross the range unlike a normal FPR that would keep a constant ( raised ) Fuel pressure.

it was this statment
"The overall effect is that the car will run very nicely closed loop with smallish injectors and becomes a fuel fed turbo car under boost (the extra fuel pressure makes them flow more). There are limitations of course. Fuel pump output and too small injectors, etc."

that made me think you were saying it would flow normally in closed loop, and then run heaps more fuel needed for extra boost higher up. ( meaning not constant ).

you should always Tune your fuel and timing maps if you are changing anything like the Fuel pressure, you should at very least adjust your k value to suit the higher fuel rate so the ECU still knows how much fuel it is ACTUALLY putting in.
Using a wideband 02 is the best method
_________________
1970 Datsun 1600 CA18DET Project

The point of life is not 2 arrive at your grave all preserved & in mint condition, but 2 slide in sideways, scratched & bruised screaming F**K WHAT A RIDE!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Lew_ecu



Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ANY adjustable FPR can make smaller injectors flow more.


Not for an adaptive ECU under certain conditions.

If you have a adjustable FPR (not a rising rate), and increase the fuel pressure from 30 psi to 33 psi, the adaptive control would sense this.

It senses this by the O2 signal feedback. The O2 signals will 'tell' the ecu it is too rich and it will back off PWM accordingly to bring the stoichio condition around for closed loop conditions.

But the ecu also takes that information and applys it to open loop condition. The gain value is adaptively computated from closed loop conditions.

In other words, the ecu can null out an increase in fuel pressure (within its limits). So the statement that ANY adjustable FPR can make smaller injectors flow more would be for a non-adaptive ecu only.

What the BEGI RRFPR neatly does is NOT mess with the closed loop conditions and ONLY increases fuel pressure during open-loop. It effectively works with the ecu maintaining desirable things like economy and drivability, starting, etc but allows small injectors to really open up under boost conditions. It actually is a closed loop device itself since boost feedback is driving it.

The adaptive ecu is self tuning to a degree. It can adjust itself for things like variations in injector size, fuel pressure, etc. But how much is the main concern.

300zx 84-89 ecus have a built in feedback system for the operator. By reading the LEDs on the ecu, you can tell if the mixture mode is being held closed loop. Anyone with these year cars should know how to read these LED modes. People with earlier Z cars should consider retrofitting the ecus, etc from these cars to their cars. If I had a 280zx for example, I would adapt a 300zx NA ecu.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
raddy



Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 95

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For example, in ca18det ECU we succesfully used raised fuel pressure to move out from lean mixtrure, ca18det ECU is not adaptive (at least it is not in closed loop).
This ECU does not sense raised fuel pressure, so you can push more fuel from small injectors at top end and avoid lean mixture. Of course, it will overfuel at lower rpm band than.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lew_ecu



Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most every ecu with O2 sensor feedback and PWM on the injectors is adaptive to some extant. The CA18det would be adaptive. The ecu does not sense fuel pressure but just O2 signals and therefore mixture ratio. It modifies the PWM on the injectors accordingly.

From closed loop operation, it then sets the open loop parameters.

How much did you raise the fuel pressure? If its too much an increase, it may be beyond the ecu's ability to adjust to it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
raddy



Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 95

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It was raised by 3psi in one case, just to make correct AF at top end (out of O2 feedback). you can find more topics about this at www.sxoc.uk.

Can you say what kind of (additive) maps in ECU is responsible for this corrections in open loop?

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
luk



Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

K-value should be adjusted if your fuel pressure is revised.

E.g.

370cc@3bar

if you raise the fuel pressure to 4 bar the injectors will flow more.


_____________RP
Square root----------- x SF
_____________SP

RP= Revised pressure
SP= Standard pressure
SF= static flow

3bar = 43.5 psi
4bar = 58 psi

______________58
square root of ------- = 1.15 x 370 = 425.5
_____________43.5

So the new injector flow will be aprox. 425cc…adjust your k-value for your new flow rate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lew_ecu



Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you raise the fuel pressure by 3 psi on a 37 psi system, the ecu should be able to adjust the PWM on the injectors so that O2 signals match the expected stoichiometric ratio. This is closed loop control

But this will also have an effect on open loop control. The ecu 'knows' that the injector PWM was changed during closed loop control and will modify open loop PWM accordingly. During open loop, when the ecu is basically just using feed-forward info (the MAF output), it will sense the air and inject the fuel as it has already set by using closed loop control.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
luk



Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

whats the point in rasing fuel pressure 3 psi?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lew_ecu



Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 5:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If someone raised FP from 37 to 40 psi, then that would correspond to SQRT(40/37)=4% enrichment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nissan ECU Tuning Forum Index -> Turbo Related All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Free Forum Free Top Site List
Make this Forum Ad-Free