| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
luk
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMO thats one getho thing to do!
In my point of view its only worthwhile to change your fuel pressure if you're reaching very high injector duty cycle.
Correcting AFR with the fuel pressure regulator...it’s a kid’s thing.
Please don’t take it as an insult  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lew_ecu
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Luk
I am not sure if you have followed the conversation.
What I am saying is that Raddy is changing the fuel pressure across the whole RPM range. The ecu, under closed loop conditions will null out what he is doing. It will also know that the fuel pressure has changed and back off the open loop gain for the PWM.
In other words, it gets him nothing. It isn't ghetto. Its just wrong.
The use of a RRFPR should not be compared with these other 'across the board' variable fuel pressure regulators.
The RRFPR is a boost actuated device and will only operate as needed. It never effects the closed-loop operation and therefore effectively works with the ecu. the drivability, economy, emmisions, etc are not effected while the boost AFR is dramatically benefitted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raddy
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lew_ecu:
but why rising of fuel pressure cured lean mixture at top end than???
it looks like ECU does not change injector pulses, otherwise AFR should be same like before, isnt it?
by the way:
If I rise base fuel pressure to 3bar (from 2.5bar as stock), I should get about 533cc of fuel flow from my 444cc injectors....if I adjust K req. number for 533cc flow, will be fueling correct with lower injectors duty cycle? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
datsunboy
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 209 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes....thats correct.
you just modify it like you were actually putting bigger injectors in _________________ 1970 Datsun 1600 CA18DET Project
The point of life is not 2 arrive at your grave all preserved & in mint condition, but 2 slide in sideways, scratched & bruised screaming F**K WHAT A RIDE!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luk
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lew_ecu wrote: | Luk
I am not sure if you have followed the conversation.
What I am saying is that Raddy is changing the fuel pressure across the whole RPM range. The ecu, under closed loop conditions will null out what he is doing. It will also know that the fuel pressure has changed and back off the open loop gain for the PWM.
In other words, it gets him nothing. It isn't ghetto. Its just wrong.
The use of a RRFPR should not be compared with these other 'across the board' variable fuel pressure regulators.
The RRFPR is a boost actuated device and will only operate as needed. It never effects the closed-loop operation and therefore effectively works with the ecu. the drivability, economy, emmisions, etc are not effected while the boost AFR is dramatically benefitted. |
I did read everything....and i still think the samething. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lew_ecu
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
by the way:
If I rise base fuel pressure to 3bar (from 2.5bar as stock), I should get about 533cc of fuel flow from my 444cc injectors....if I adjust K req. number for 533cc flow, will be fueling correct with lower injectors duty cycle?
The formula is sqrt(3/2.5). Its not a linear relationship. Its 486cc at the higher pressure |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luk
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.csgnetwork.com/fiflowcalc.html
a injector flow test would be the best way IMO...but its really easy to find your new k-value, just fill your fuel map with 1's; and tweak your k-value till you get lambda 1 all around. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
datsunboy
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 209 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so luk, when tweaking your k value in this way....
how do you tweak the Void time? ie how do you know when to change it and by how much when your trying to fine tune it from the estimated formula? _________________ 1970 Datsun 1600 CA18DET Project
The point of life is not 2 arrive at your grave all preserved & in mint condition, but 2 slide in sideways, scratched & bruised screaming F**K WHAT A RIDE!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luk
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that formula is for injector flow only.
why do you wanna tweak the void time...if you're using the same injectors? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
datsunboy
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 209 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
na.....when changing injectors.....
theres a formula for both void time and K value.....but both ( void more than k ) are really only guestimates, and should be fine tuned.....
I have 440cc injectors...have changed the void and K.....but want to tune it properly.... _________________ 1970 Datsun 1600 CA18DET Project
The point of life is not 2 arrive at your grave all preserved & in mint condition, but 2 slide in sideways, scratched & bruised screaming F**K WHAT A RIDE!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luk
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually Void time (injector lag/latency….call it what you want) is far from being a guesstimated value….if you use search you’ll realize that.
And as far as I know there isn’t any formula to guesstimate the injector latency…because that is really impossible to achieve, different brands of injector have different opening times….and the size isn’t the only thing that matters.
And as for K-value there is a formula to guesstimate, but K-value isn’t really a linear calculation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lew_ecu
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since I have an extensive background with electrical motors, I wonder if injectors can vary as much as motors do.
I suppose using an oscilloscope to look at each injectors rise and fall times as a function of RPM could be used. A very good average could then be achieved. If you had a V6 and you had 8 injectors, you could match the best 6 for closeness (assuming that you have had them all flow tested closely enough also). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
datsunboy
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 209 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the only injector latency formula I have is the one from the VG30 ECU tuning site ( www.tripod...... ). and he saysy on there that its not quite right.
other than actually KNOWING the latency to begin with, is there not any other way of getting it? ie a formula.
and when changing this number up and down while tuning, how does it affect the running of the engnie? is it manily for a smoother idle? or nothing to do with that?
I know different size/manufacture means different latency.....Im just trying to figuree out how to optimize this value when I dont know exactly what it is meant to be. _________________ 1970 Datsun 1600 CA18DET Project
The point of life is not 2 arrive at your grave all preserved & in mint condition, but 2 slide in sideways, scratched & bruised screaming F**K WHAT A RIDE!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luk
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 93
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
datsunboy
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 209 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
hmmm ok.
I have just tried searching the net for a bit, and cant find a commonly used latency for DSM 440cc injectors ?
I did find a post on this forum that said something about a PDF with a table of commonly used latency times....but the PDF was no longer there to download. _________________ 1970 Datsun 1600 CA18DET Project
The point of life is not 2 arrive at your grave all preserved & in mint condition, but 2 slide in sideways, scratched & bruised screaming F**K WHAT A RIDE!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|